Difference between revisions of "Spikes and sharp waves"
From EEGpedia
(Created page with "* Sharply contoured transients, clearly distinguishable from and usually interrupt background activities * Almost always negative wave, so pointed upwards on the EEG * Spike:...") |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*[[Muscle artifact]] | *[[Muscle artifact]] | ||
*[[Eye blink artifact]] | *[[Eye blink artifact]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Notes''' | ||
| + | <references/> | ||
Revision as of 12:23, 9 June 2017
- Sharply contoured transients, clearly distinguishable from and usually interrupt background activities
- Almost always negative wave, so pointed upwards on the EEG
- Spike: Duration of <70 milliseconds
- Sharp wave: Duration of 70-200 milliseconds
- No difference in etiology or prognosis between a spike or sharp wave
Clinical relevance
- If seen in a patient with reasonably high suspicion of a seizure, the predictive value of spikes and sharp waves for epilepsy is high .
- In healthy adults, spikes and sharp waves are seen in about 0.5-1%. In healthy children in about 3-5%. [1]
- After a first seizure, the presence of interictal spikes and sharp waves doubles the likelihood of seizure recurrence. [2]
- The absence of interictal spikes and sharp waves does not prove that the patient does not have epilepsy.
Do not confuse with:
- Small sharp spikes (SSS or BETS)
- Wicket spikes
- 6 Hz spike-and-wave bursts (WHAM and FOLD)
- ECG artifact
- Muscle artifact
- Eye blink artifact
Notes
- ↑ Okubo et al, Epileptiform EEG discharges in healthy children: prevalence, emotional and behavioral correlates, and genetic influences, Epilepsia. 1994 Jul-Aug;35(4):832-41.
- ↑ Berg AT, Shinnar S. risk of seizure recurrence following a first unprovoked seizure: a quantitative review. Neurology. 1991. 41:965-72.
